Has Dark Horse Conan been Screwed by the Network
Mar 23, 2017 14:49:05 GMT -5
Post by lordyam on Mar 23, 2017 14:49:05 GMT -5
To quote TvTropes
"The prototypical network executive's time revolves not around nurturing talent for the benefit of all, but around making him or herself look competent. That means appearing responsible for every success and innocent of every failing that the network might have, irrespective of whether this was actually the case. Plus, the people that the executive is trying to convince are his or her fellow executives, who are likewise having the exact same neurotic crisis day in and day out.
Nevertheless, the need to keep their channels populated with new shows means that their commissioning bodies will keep putting forward all kinds of shows that may or may not appeal to the network executives' sensibilities.
For this reason, the execs will sometimes find themselves in the unfortunate position of being in charge of a show that they do not understand and therefore do not know what to do with. This presents them with a tricky situation: if the show is a failure they risk losing face, but if the show is a success then they'll look redundant.
Alternatively, the show may be a legacy commission under your predecessor, which is worse — because if it's a success, they'll have one up on you, but if you cancel it straight off, you'll lose all plausible deniability when people call you petty and small.
The answer to both of these problems, of course, is to screw the show over completely. Put it in a different time slot each episode, show it in the wrong order, bury it at midnight or in the Friday Night Death Slot, put it up against the other networks' strongest shows... do everything you can for it to build up a regular viewing audience that's not quite big enough to warrant the budget, but just big enough to cause some trouble when you cancel it for not "attracting the right audience."
Honestly, given the latest blunders (switching an artist mid arc) I can't help but wonder if this is what Dark Horse is doing. The original editor seemed very passionate about it and determined to do well. We saw a large amount of Conan products in 2004-2010, and the writing and art was pretty consistent barring Kurt Busiek leaving mid series.
But Brian Wood, by his own admission, was encouraged NOT to read the previous series or read any more then queen of the black coast. It makes me wonder WAS there a regime change sometime in 2010?
"The prototypical network executive's time revolves not around nurturing talent for the benefit of all, but around making him or herself look competent. That means appearing responsible for every success and innocent of every failing that the network might have, irrespective of whether this was actually the case. Plus, the people that the executive is trying to convince are his or her fellow executives, who are likewise having the exact same neurotic crisis day in and day out.
Nevertheless, the need to keep their channels populated with new shows means that their commissioning bodies will keep putting forward all kinds of shows that may or may not appeal to the network executives' sensibilities.
For this reason, the execs will sometimes find themselves in the unfortunate position of being in charge of a show that they do not understand and therefore do not know what to do with. This presents them with a tricky situation: if the show is a failure they risk losing face, but if the show is a success then they'll look redundant.
Alternatively, the show may be a legacy commission under your predecessor, which is worse — because if it's a success, they'll have one up on you, but if you cancel it straight off, you'll lose all plausible deniability when people call you petty and small.
The answer to both of these problems, of course, is to screw the show over completely. Put it in a different time slot each episode, show it in the wrong order, bury it at midnight or in the Friday Night Death Slot, put it up against the other networks' strongest shows... do everything you can for it to build up a regular viewing audience that's not quite big enough to warrant the budget, but just big enough to cause some trouble when you cancel it for not "attracting the right audience."
Honestly, given the latest blunders (switching an artist mid arc) I can't help but wonder if this is what Dark Horse is doing. The original editor seemed very passionate about it and determined to do well. We saw a large amount of Conan products in 2004-2010, and the writing and art was pretty consistent barring Kurt Busiek leaving mid series.
But Brian Wood, by his own admission, was encouraged NOT to read the previous series or read any more then queen of the black coast. It makes me wonder WAS there a regime change sometime in 2010?
